There
is something Newtonian, not yet Einsteinian, besides something morally naïve,
about living in a reference frame where one species takes itself as absolute
and values everything else relative to its utility. If true to their specific
epithet, ought not Homo sapiens value this host of life with something of a claim to care in its own
right? Man may be the only measurer of things, but is man the only measure of
things?
Taken from the 1990 essay ‘Challenges in Environmental
Ethics’ by the american philosopher Holmes Rolston III.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holmes_Rolston_III
No comments:
Post a Comment